WAITING FOR THE SHADOW

SOLAR AND LUNAR ECLIPSE OBSERVING

HOME PAGE


 ABOUT

 CONTACT

PAST ECLIPSES

 FUTURE ECLIPSES

 OTHER EVENTS

 ECLIPSE PRIMER

 ECLIPSES AUSTRALIA

 LINKS

A Tale of Ten Eclipses
Evolution of my eclipse chasing equipment over the past 17 years or how in the space of ten eclipses I went from



this                        to              this



The challenge for solar eclipse chasers is to travel with what can be a heavy burden of equipment. Total solar eclipses (TSE's) can only be observed from relatively narrow geographic paths across the Earth's surface. A typical eclipse can be observed as total from only 1% of the Earth's surface and much of that is usually ocean. A total eclipse is only visible from your backyard on average once every 375 years and this is just an average for the whole Earth over thousands of years. The time that passes between total solar eclipses for a specific location can be much greater. For example, from my home in Canberra, the last total eclipse was visible in 1247 AD for a miserly 23 seconds and the next in 2337AD for just 1m 47s. So we poor eclipse chasers are forced  to travel to sometimes remote or exotic locations to indulge our hobby. It's a hard life but someone has to do it.

Like all eclipse chasers, my equipment kit has evolved considerably over the years. I began eclipse chasing with light flimsy equipment. As I've tried to do more photography, my kit grew much heavier. Over the past 9 years, I've put considerable effort into lightening the weight of my kit while retaining or even improving functionality and stability. I've done this by using the old mountaineering adage : watch the grams, the kilograms will take care of themselves.  My checked luggage for the total eclipse in Zambia in 2001 was 30kg. In July 2009, I checked 21.5kg yet I have what I believe is a better setup.  For TSE 2010, I checked in 19kg and only carried 3kg of hand luggage.  This met a restriction imposed by the airline due to the specifications of the aircraft(ATR45) and the shortness of the runway (1100m).  

Better doesn't mean more equipment nor does it necessarily mean more weight.  

NEXT PAGE ->